In Text Advertising and User Experience


February 09, 2009

Within the constantly evolving online world, some norms are re-examined every time a new technology, beyond a certain size and scope of influence, is introduced. In other words, most new technologies undergo some period of “evaluation” by users, upon first emerging into the market; a period which could last from months to years.  If you recall the discussion around RSS earlier in the decade, quite a few site owners and bloggers at the time were concerned with their content being republished and read elsewhere, while their site does not gain the visits for the content.  It took some time before web publishers fully accepted the outweighing benefits of RSS, one being the fact that it enables a greater reach and thus a greater readership for their content.  The benefits that RSS afforded to users, proved to be an advantage to publishers as well.

Something similar has happened with In-Text Advertising. In-Text became widespread as its benefits became well known.  If we look back to earlier in the decade, In-Text Advertising was causing some controversy as some prominent websites, began to display ads and information, within their content.  As quoted on iMedia, “The problem that caused the controversy in In-Text Advertising had more to do with the medium in which it appeared than with the message.”  It was not so much an issue with the advertisement as with the new medium through which they were served.  In the case of Kontera’s In-Text, the benefits to advertisers and to publishers are well known. But as Kontera’s philosophy is three fold, we wanted to highlight the main benefit In-Text hold for users. Indeed, in the last few years, Kontera’s contextual advertising technology has proved its advantages to users by offering a distinct added value- access to highly relevant ads and information that is in sync with the most current interest and state of mind of the reader.

Perhaps the greatest advantage of In-Text lies in the fact that it suits today’s dynamic online mode of work. We are already a different type of online user than we were even 5 years ago.   We refer to the contemporary multi-tasking user.  We know all about the- multi tabbing, multi window, updating my Facebook while completing chart on excel- mode of work.  Considering this, it’s really not surprising that In-Text has earned its popularity over the past few years.  With the possibility of being in more than one place at a time, finding access to extended information while being engaged with content, Kontera’s In Text brings an added value to today’s online user.

Tags: Categories: In Text Advertising, Uncategorized

2 Responses to  “In Text Advertising and User Experience”

  1. Andy Baker says:

    In-text advertising’s crude keyword matching is the problem. I often see it placed in offensively inappropriate passages. Surely this damages the reputatin of advertiser and publisher?

    Until you manage to build in some kind of ‘poor-taste’ detector then I can’t wait to see the demise of this approach.

    I might feel a little kindly disposed towards you if you offered an opt-out.

  2. mika says:

    Hello Andy,
    I regret to hear you feel this way. Relevancy is at the heart of In-Text. As an In Text provider, our primary goal is to deliver the most contextually relevant information. We are continuously working to advance our engines in order to provide better, more accurate results.
    We are open to hearing specific review or criticism on any type of ad you run into, certainly if you find it to be irrelevant. In this fashion we’ll be able to address the issue directly. Please reach us at support@kontera.com

    We do offer the option to opt out, see question mark on the top right of our ContentLink ad layer.

Leave a Comment

Theme by: WP Theme | Icons by N.Design Studio Entries RSS Comments RSS